21 Mar United Airlines (UAL)
Date of Work: 1996-1998
Background:
The United Airlines (UAL) San Francisco Maintenance Center is responsible for performing many high-risk functions 365 days a year. The facility department is faced with the difficulty of maintaining approximately 5 million square feet of office space, 135 acres of land, seven hangars, and various other buildings. Traditionally, projects were awarded using the low-bid process, resulting in costly change orders and low quality work.
Lessons Learned:
- Quality construction was procured with less management and inspection.
 - Performers gravitated to UAL.
 - By using performance information at the right time, UAL minimized the amount of technical specifications it used.
 - The best value PIPS can be implemented by non-technical personnel.
 - High performing subcontractors can work on the same project without a general contractor.
 - The high performance projects led to ten years of high performance, more than doubling the expectation of the client, and making their facility envelope/floors maintenance free for over ten years.
 
PIPS Performance:
The United Airlines maintenance
facility implemented PIPS for over 2 years. 
During this time period, the project manager ran PIPS on every type of
project that he was involved on, including:
- General construction
 - Roofing
 - Painting
 - Flooring
 - High-speed roll-up doors
 - Elevator installation
 - Underground storage tanks
 - Submersible pumps
 - Environmental projects
 
Results were far superior to anything that had been procured at the facility. (Table 15.1)
| # | Criteria | Results | 
| 1 | Total number of projects | 32 | 
| 2 | Total award amount | $13 Million | 
| 3 | Users comparison – Low Bid vs. Performance-Based | 3 : 9 | 
| 4 | Overall satisfaction of PIPS | 100% | 
| 5 | Overall quality of construction procured using PIPS (10 max) | 9 | 
| 6 | Percent of PIPS contractors that would be hired again | 95% | 
| 7 | Percent of project finished on time | 98% | 
| 8 | Percent of projects finished within budget | 100% | 
| 9 | Percent of projects with no change orders | 100% | 
| 10 | Number of companies that were evaluated (PPI) | 75 | 
Table 15.1: Results of PIPS Projects at United Airlines