07 Oct Reducing Vendor Protests in Procurement: The Best Value Approach
Vendor protests are one of the most common and time-consuming issues that organizations face during procurement processes. They can delay projects, increase costs, and even lead to legal disputes. These protests can last for months to years with so much wasted efforts. All clients are looking for a solution to eliminate the possibilities of protests! Enter the Best Value Approach (BVA). This innovative methodology has helped to eliminate protests due to the innovative structure and a proven track record of zero protests won.
Why Do Vendor Protests Happen?
Vendor protests typically occur when suppliers believe the procurement process was unfair, biased, or did not follow proper guidelines. This can be due to the procurement structure of just the individuals on the selection committee or during the process. Some common reasons for protests include:
- Unclear or biased evaluation criteria – Vendors may protest if they feel the criteria were not clearly communicated or unfairly favored a competitor. This happens all the time when things constantly change in a RFP or client is not set on what they want to do.
- Poor communication – Miscommunication between the client and vendor can lead to misunderstandings about project requirements, which, in turn, lead to disputes. In processes where there is a lot of communication, it can put the accountability on the clients to manage things.
- Perceived unfair treatment – If vendors feel that their submissions were not evaluated fairly, they may file protests. This can be a valid concern which should be addressed
- Errors in the procurement process – Mistakes in documentation, evaluations, or award decisions can open the door to protests. Obviously, there can be a lot of different processes with errors in it.
These protests not only cause delays but can also damage relationships between buyers and suppliers. However, by using the Best Value Approach, organizations can mitigate these issues by resolving all of these causes
How the Best Value Approach Combats Vendor Protests
- Transparency from the Start
One of the fundamental principles of the Best Value Approach is transparency. The method requires that all requirements, evaluation criteria, and expectations are clearly communicated at the beginning of the procurement process. This clarity ensures that vendors know exactly what the buyer is looking for and how they will be evaluated. It has a structure which puts the accountability onto the vendors to submit their proposals, show their expertise and resolve any issues that are brought up.
When vendors understand the process, they are less likely to protest. By reducing ambiguity, the Best Value Approach removes many of the common triggers for disputes. The structure is so simple that no one can dispute it. Everything is given to the vendors and explanation on what happened. There is no hidden decisions or backdoor conversations. Everything is done logically and unbiased.
- Objective and Measurable Criteria
In traditional procurement, subjective evaluations can lead to protests. For example, if vendors feel that they were rated unfairly due to personal preferences or inconsistent application of criteria, they may challenge the decision. Some committee members might rate a proposal a 5 and then the next proposal a 6. It can be difficult to tell why one was given a higher rating. Vendors can lose a project due to a few points that a committee member rated them.
The Best Value Approach combats this by focusing on measurable and objective criteria. Vendors are evaluated based on their track record, performance metrics, and ability to manage risks. These criteria are quantifiable, reducing the likelihood of disputes over subjective judgments. The rating system is simple and straightforward. If they have metrics showing they can do the project, they get a 10. If they don’t show metrics, they get a 5. These are the main ratings given and there is no confusing these.
Furthermore, because the evaluation process is more straightforward and measurable, vendors can self-assess how they performed relative to their competitors. This minimizes the chances of a vendor protesting because they can clearly see how they were evaluated. They can understand that they didn’t have the metrics necessary or that another vendor had a lower price or etc…
- Risk Management
Another key aspect of the Best Value Approach is its emphasis on risk management. Vendors are required to identify potential risks in the project and propose solutions to mitigate those risks. This shifts some of the responsibility for risk from the buyer to the vendor.
By addressing risks early in the procurement process, vendors can present more comprehensive and realistic proposals. This allows them to use their expertise to provide solutions to show that they are the true expert. This reduces the likelihood of misunderstandings or unrealistic expectations, which are often the source of vendor protests.
When vendors have a clear understanding of the project’s risks and how they are expected to manage them, they are less likely to dispute the final decision. In turn, buyers have a clearer picture of which vendor is best suited to deliver the project successfully, minimizing the chance of selecting a vendor who may later underperform or fail to deliver. Overall, everyone is able to understand the breadth of the project and address anything that needs to be done. If a vendor is chosen and they can’t make a plan that suits the client, then the project will go to another vendor.
- Vendor Involvement in Decision-Making
Unlike traditional procurement, where the buyer holds most of the decision-making power, the Best Value Approach encourages vendor involvement. Vendors play an active role in the procurement process by providing detailed information about their performance history and how they plan to execute the project. The vendors decide who will win the project by what they provide and the clarity they give to the client.
This level of vendor participation helps build trust and reduces the likelihood of protests because vendors feel more included in the decision-making process. They are also better able to showcase their unique strengths and how they align with the buyer’s needs. Each vendor will be given a fair chance based on their own experience and plan.
Involving vendors from the start also creates a more cooperative atmosphere, leading to fewer misunderstandings and disputes. Vendors who feel heard and respected are less likely to challenge the outcome of the procurement process. These vendors understand what is going on so there are no suprises
- Post-Award Transparency and Accountability
The Best Value Approach doesn’t stop once a vendor is selected. It emphasizes continued transparency and accountability throughout the project lifecycle. Vendors are held to clear performance metrics and are required to provide regular updates on their progress.
This post-award transparency ensures that both the buyer and the vendor stay aligned throughout the project, reducing the likelihood of disputes down the line. Vendors who are regularly engaged and held accountable are less likely to encounter issues that could lead to performance disputes or project delays.
If a vendor knows they will be regularly evaluated and that their performance is tied to measurable outcomes, they are less likely to protest the procurement process or their selection, as they know that accountability continues well beyond the initial award.
Conclusion: A Win-Win for Buyers and Vendors
The Best Value Approach offers a solution to one of the most persistent challenges in procurement: vendor protests. By emphasizing transparency, objectivity, risk management, and vendor involvement, this approach creates a more collaborative and fair procurement process. For organizations looking to avoid costly and time-consuming disputes, the Best Value Approach provides a clear path forward.
For vendors, the approach ensures that their expertise, performance, and value are fully recognized, rather than just focusing on the lowest bid. For buyers, it reduces the risk of disputes and leads to better project outcomes. In essence, it’s a win-win for everyone involved in the procurement process.
To learn more about the Best Value Approach go to out YouTube Channel for: CLICK HERE or website CLICK HERE.
Image Designed by freepik